![shade 45 hate it or love it shade 45 hate it or love it](https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0575/2773/0376/products/41GhNCrojlL_9000ef8e-5e37-45bb-8bb8-d0544c697749_1024x1024.jpg)
But there is something of a mood, or rather a vibe, to each reading method: a logic that underlies and gives rise to the haze of feeling around it. The feeling of reading itself has no normative system or proofs - it's too steeped in time, in change and flux and conflict and perspective. It's rare that a reader feels only positively or only negatively about a text or an author or a concept.) ("A formal feeling comes.") Isn't intelligence, too, really a kind of feeling - a feel for ideas? (All these feelings tend to erupt in contradiction. 2 We know, deep down, that there is something like a feeling for certain writers and for certain aesthetics, a feeling in our literary tastes - and there is feeling in argument, in the profession, too. Feelings signify "the personal" as opposed to "the rigorous." ("Don't take it personally.") Nothing is more disavowed than feeling in the discipline.
![shade 45 hate it or love it shade 45 hate it or love it](http://www.ilcampeggiodicapalbio.it/files_blog/2015-07-29-09-45-26-1_3b2981dc3a020682554e98faf5e1e420.jpg)
But regardless of what we think, we all seem to feel that to reveal our personal feelings - whether warm or cool or both - about what and how we read is a little self-indulgent. For post-critics who bemoan the negativity implicit in critique - harshness, coldness - to refuse to account for these feelings is disingenuous or worse, cuttingly clinical, and must be repaired. For hermeneutical paranoids invested in symptomatic critique, dwelling on these feelings is felt to be naïve. For formalists, these feelings might be banished from the analysis or sublimated into the rapturous diction used to describe textual details. We allow that subjective feelings play a part in how we read artistic and scholarly texts. Yes, reading may have mysterious attractions and revulsions - partly sensory, mostly cognitive - but they can yet be brought under the sovereignty of reasoned argument. Many scholars think of reading literature as a method that we can subject to meta-analysis. I take these to be debates about how we should approach literary forms. Though I am speaking about a practice of black femme "reading" that, among other things, often specifies to the point of fastidiousness, these matters are broadly relevant to the so-called "reading debates" in literary criticism of the past three decades. My wish to analyze shade, to draw its contours and to recount its history, springs out of a deep sympathy modified by distance. It is rare that someone fully immersed in a given practice is interested in examining it it is almost always preferable, whatever her expertise, to do it.
![shade 45 hate it or love it shade 45 hate it or love it](https://cdn.albumoftheyear.org/album/54398-hot-in-the-shade.jpg)
But that is also why I want to talk about it, and why I can. I feel strongly drawn to shade and almost as strongly excluded from it - rightly so, as a bougie Zambian immigrant professor. For myself, I plead the aim of pleasure and the aid of a sharp tension in my own relation to it. If that betrayal is to be defended, it will be for the intellectual delights it offers and the affective tensions - the contemporary mood - it registers. Perhaps to analyze shade would be to betray it. Apart from appearances in a handful of queer studies texts - the fiction anthology Shade (1996), the scholarly anthology No Tea, No Shade (2016) , Tavia Nyong'o's Afro-Fabulations (2018), Timothy Oleksiak's "When Queers Listen" (2019) - it has hardly broken into academia.
#Shade 45 hate it or love it code#
And it is black and femme - a fiercely private code for survival, a badge of pride within certain cultural cliques. It's not a natural topic for study it is, as one of its finest analysts and practitioners put it, an art of "the bookless." 1 It adores performance: sprezzatura and gestural reaction, oracular intensity and tonal sophistication. One of these is the practice of "reading" - adjacent to "camp" but not identical with it - that also goes by the name of "shade."Ī practice (as distinct from an idea) is one of the hardest things to analyze, but there are special reasons why shade, in particular, has rarely been examined in a scholarly way. Many things in this world haven't yet been named many things, even if they have been named, have barely been described.